thoughts on Mark Leidner’s “the angel in the dream of our hangover”

June 6, 2011 § 2 Comments

When our virtual social interaction is limited to facebook status updates and 140 character tweets, the ability to produce memorable aphorisms is becoming a desirable trait. As I read Mark Leidner’s new book from Sator Press “the angel in the dream of our hangover,” I couldn’t help but think on almost every page, if this were a tweet I would favorite it. Because they sound like tweets. But after thinking more on it, what I realized is that I had it backwards; that rather, all tweets sound like aphorisms.

a question mark, like a glass blown exclamation point, takes the shape of love

First, let’s just acknowledge the imagistic movement in this example taken from Leidner’s book. We move from exclamation point, to question mark, to heart (love). What happens in my head is an entire cartoon sequence of a glass blower taking two exclamation points, blowing them each into question marks, then putting them together to form a heart. But does a clever simile make an aphorism (which isn’t to say it isn’t a magnificently clever and memorable simile)? What ends up being important here, for me, is the idea of text taking the shape of something. I want the whole aphorism to meta-refer to the art of aphoristic writing itself, and maybe even more generally, the art of writing. Text takes the shape of literal image takes the shape of emotion. I learn something about what makes good literature from this. Personally, if I had thought of the simile that a question mark is like a glass blown exclamation point, I wouldn’t be able to get over the excitement of what I had just thought of. Which is to say, I’m too novice or egotistical a writer to even think of trying to develop a context for it. I would probably just tweet it and feel happy for a while about it. But here is the difference between a tweet and an aphorism, the point at which depth and wisdom trump cleverness, the point where beauty and meaning intersect…

Advertisements

§ 2 Responses to thoughts on Mark Leidner’s “the angel in the dream of our hangover”

  • Eric Beeny says:

    Nice! Awesome interpretation, Darby. I want this book so bad, but I’m so broke. I hope it goes into multiple printings so that at some point I’ll scoop one up. Until then, he’s thankfully still tweeting…

  • the good writers says:

    Yay, yip, yahoo. Another non-paying ezine dying its silent death. When will editors learn that the only journals that receive the full support of the very best and hardest working writers are those that pay and pay well? Those who “just can’t afford it gosh” really have no business existing. Now do they?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

What’s this?

You are currently reading thoughts on Mark Leidner’s “the angel in the dream of our hangover” at ABJECTIBLOG.

meta

%d bloggers like this: